Subject: [xsl] Re: Re: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: RE: syntaxsugar for call-template) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:15:44 -0800 (PST) |
Clark C. Evans wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Dimitre Novatchev wrote: > > > > > > exsl:call('my:func', 'Name1?Value1", 'Name2?Value2') > > > > > > Where "?" is to be replaced by some delimiter, perhaps space. > > > > > > > The following looks very straightforward: > > > > exsl:call('my:func', 'Name1=Value1", 'Name2=Value2') > > > > The "=" operator is already defined in XPath. > How about: > > exsl:call('my:func','my:name := value', ... ) I would still prefer the shorter "=". Yes, it is an XPath operator, but it is just a regular character in a string for XPath in this case. There's no ambiguity. Then the pure positional and mixed invocations will also have a very straightforward form: exsl:call('my:func', '=Value1", '=Value2') and, respectively: exsl:call('my:func', '=Value1", '=Value2' 'Name3=Value3') Dimitre Novatchev. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: The top 10 limitations of XSLT , Francis Norton | Thread | [xsl] Fwd: xsl example, Mulberry Technologie |
Re: The top 10 limitations of XSLT , Clark C. Evans | Date | [xsl] Fwd: xsl example, Mulberry Technologie |
Month |