Subject: RE: [xsl] 2.1 Must Allow Matching on Default Namespace Without Explicit Prefix From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 00:09:45 -0000 |
> But you still didn't answer my question. Will the default > namespace be used > to evaluate XPath expressions? I know they're different > specs, but I think > inconsistency there would cause even more confusion. What's published so far is a requirements statement. Don't assume that anyone knows what the solution to the requirement will be. It's quite possible that the working group will decide that there's no acceptable solution that meets the compatibility goals. All the requirements statement says is that there's a recognized problem that needs to be addressed. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] 2.1 Must Allow Matching o, Dave Hartnoll | Thread | Re: [xsl] 2.1 Must Allow Matching o, Uche Ogbuji |
RE: [xsl] XQuery (was Designs for X, Evan Lenz | Date | RE: [xsl] string question, David Santamauro |
Month |