Subject: Re: The top 10 limitations of XSLT 1.0 (was RE: [xsl] RE: Designsfor XSLT functions) From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:45:04 +0000 |
"Clark C. Evans" wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Andrew Kimball wrote: > > If the top 10 limitations of XSLT 1.0 were solved, then I think the roar > > of demand for xsl:script and xsl:evaluate would be reduced to a whimper. > > Hurray! > > > 1. The lack of real string comparison > > 2. No support for dates > > 3. No simple mechanism for grouping > > 4. No querying into RTF's > 5. More node-set operations: intersect, difference, and equals > 6. Poor support for modulization (template calling syntax sucks) > 7. No ability to create functions in XSLT callable from XPath 8. Support for file-spec skeletons in document() or in a specific dir() function Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: The top 10 limitations of XSLT , Clark C. Evans | Thread | [xsl] Re: Re: Re: Designs for XSLT , Dimitre Novatchev |
[xsl] Select distinct elements, Jakub Maly | Date | Re: [xsl] 2.1 Must Allow Matching o, Dave Hartnoll |
Month |