Subject: Re: [xsl] [exsl] Draft 0.1 - call for comments From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 01:10:21 -0700 |
> > Looks like it's adding up to a pretty compelling case for a read-only > > "xpathType()" function. > > Something like: > > Function: string exsl:object-type(object) > > The exsl:node-type function returns a string giving the type of the > object passed as the argument. The possible object types are: > 'string', 'number', 'boolean', 'node-set' or 'RTF'. > > [Note: The description would change in version 1.1 (matching XSLT 1.1) > to: > > The exsl:node-type function returns a string giving the type of the > object passed as the argument. The possible object types are: > 'string', 'number', 'boolean', 'node-set' or 'external'.] I find this much more compelling than a built-in system of typeconstraints. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [exsl] Draft 0.1 - call f, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | Re: [xsl] [exsl] Draft 0.1 - call f, Francis Norton |
Re: [xsl] [exsl] Draft 0.1 - call f, Uche Ogbuji | Date | [xsl] Re: FXPath - A comment on EXS, Jeni Tennison |
Month |