Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1

[Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Hi Guys,
> 
> I just wondered if you could expand on:
> 
> > 5. Easy distribution of extension functions, a reason commonly cited
> > for embedded scripting, can be addressed separately and does not
> > necessarily have to be solved with the script metaphor, convenient
> > as it may be.
> 
> How would you like to see the easy distribution of extension functions
> being addressed?

One possible approach is that RDDL could be a pretty useful hub for extension 
function definitions and even implementation download.  Ignoring the security 
issues, it could be structured no unlike browser plug-ins.

I think this was Clark's idea originally.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com 
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list