Subject: RE: [xsl] Testing for Parent Nodes of multiple types From: "Ciaran Byrne" <ciaran.byrne@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 18:37:24 -0800 |
Sorry maybe well-formed was not used in the correct context. Initially I pass the content through the MSXML parser with no validation against a DTD. This provides me with a well-formed XML document..Doc A Even though Doc A is well-formed XML, it isn't the well-formed content I want. For example, <foo> <b> text </b> </foo> is well formed but the content I want is <foo> <p> <b> text </b> </p> </foo> After I've attempted to 'tidy' the content I do a second pass through the MSXML this time with validation on. Result: Tidied,well-formed content. -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of David Carlisle Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 10:03 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Testing for Parent Nodes of multiple types > The content I receive is not always well-formed. By passing > it through my XSL I could attempt to achieve well-formedness. ??? If it isn't weel formed it won't get past the XML parser so it will never form input to the XSL engine. You can't use XSL for documents that are not well formed XML. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Testing for Parent Nodes , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Testing for Parent Nodes , Jeni Tennison |
[xsl] Adding NewLine, Tab character, Raj Avula | Date | Re: [xsl] transforming a XML to CS, Jeni Tennison |
Month |