Subject: Re: [xsl] Functional programming in XSLT (revised) From: Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 12:31:12 +0000 |
Hi Mike, > Having said that, I made saxon:function available at the top-level > only, because I didn't want to spend the rest of my life explaining > the concept of local functions, and juistifying why they should have > access to local variables declared outside the function body. Would you mind doing it just once? I hadn't really considered the possibility of local exsl:function before, and would like to understand what its implications would be if we were to introduce it. Thanks, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Functional programming in, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Functional programming in, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Functional programming in, Alexey Gokhberg | Date | [xsl] iXSLT: XSL transformations an, Matthias O. Will |
Month |