[xsl] RE: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:result

Subject: [xsl] RE: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:result
From: "Clapham, Paul" <pclapham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:22:17 -0800
Jeni>I think we need an imperative term that doesn't imply that the
>function terminates.  exsl:result-in, exsl:fix-result,
>exsl:set-result... others?

exsl:result-is

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread