Subject: [xsl] RE: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:result From: "Clapham, Paul" <pclapham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:22:17 -0800 |
Jeni>I think we need an imperative term that doesn't imply that the >function terminates. exsl:result-in, exsl:fix-result, >exsl:set-result... others? exsl:result-is XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] iXSLT: XSL transformation, David Santamauro | Thread | RE: [xsl] RE: [exsl] Naming exsl:re, Evan Lenz |
[exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:resu, Jeni Tennison | Date | RE: [xsl] RE: [exsl] Naming exsl:re, Evan Lenz |
Month |