RE: [xsl] RE: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:result

Subject: RE: [xsl] RE: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:result
From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:52:42 -0800
exsl:make-the-result-like-so-at-some-undetermined-point-in-time

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Clapham, Paul
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 10:22 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [xsl] RE: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:result
> 
> 
> Jeni>I think we need an imperative term that doesn't imply that the
> >function terminates.  exsl:result-in, exsl:fix-result,
> >exsl:set-result... others?
> 
> exsl:result-is
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread