Subject: Re: [xsl] Efficiency of xsl:number with the "value" attribute specified From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 09:31:59 -0400 |
I meant, of course, that you aren't using number() to ***generate*** the number in the first place (although you might still be using to to format some existing number). Tom P > [Dimitre Novatchev] > > > > I have heard of recommendations to avoid xsl:number if possible, due to > efficiency > > reasons. > > > > However, the processing of xsl:number falls into two separate distinct > cases -- when > > the number is already supplied in the "value" attribute, and when not. > > > > My question is should I be concerned (so much, or at all) about > efficiency, in case > > when I'm using the "value" attribute to specify the number. > > > [Tom] > If you are using the attribute value then you are not using the number() > function, and conversely. There's no special problem about efficiency for > using the attribute value, if the source document alrady supplies it. > > Tom P > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Efficiency of xsl:number , Thomas B. Passin | Thread | [xsl] Re: using a parameter as filt, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Efficiency of xsl:number , Thomas B. Passin | Date | [xsl] <xsl:sort> not working under , Shaun Lizzio |
Month |