Re: [xsl] simple XPath question

Subject: Re: [xsl] simple XPath question
From: Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 17:00:40 +0100

Hi James,

> Did the language designers realize that subtle notions of context
> combined with implicit referents (e.g. the node list referent for
> position()) would be very confusing?

They probably wanted to make sure that they could make some money by
writing books explaining it ;)

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] simple XPath question, (continued) Michael Kay - Tue, 3 Jul 2001 09:29:22 +0100 Jeni Tennison - Tue, 3 Jul 2001 09:39:21 +0100 Message not available Sanjay Manchanda - Tue, 03 Jul 2001 09:42:13 -0700 James Melton - Tue, 03 Jul 2001 09:14:40 -0400 Jeni Tennison - Tue, 3 Jul 2001 17:00:40 +0100 <= Wendell Piez - Tue, 03 Jul 2001 14:24:41 +0100 Jeni Tennison - Wed, 4 Jul 2001 09:48:12 +0100 Wendell Piez - Wed, 04 Jul 2001 13:44:08 +0100 Ruairi - Thu, 5 Jul 2001 13:19:22 +0200

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] simple XPath question, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] simple XPath question, James Melton	Thread	Re: [xsl] simple XPath question, Wendell Piez
Re: [xsl] One for tomorrow :-), David Carlisle	Date	Re: [xsl] Is this about grouping ?, Jeni Tennison
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home