Subject: Re: [xsl] One for tomorrow :-) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 17:44:56 +0100 |
> I think he wants to stop at the first following sibling that doesn't end in > ",", perhaps, but (apart from the fact I can't spell select) I tried to answer the question as asked not the question as perhaps intended. (Admittedly doing the latter is probably more useful:-) Just in case, here's a version answering that, again avoiding recursion (even though recursion is good for the soul) <xsl:value-of select="."> <xsl:for-each select="following-sibling:* [contains(concat(.,'QWERTYUIOP'),',QWERTYUIOP') and preceding-sibling:* [contains(concat(.,'QWERTYUIOP'),',QWERTYUIOP') or not(preceding-sibling:*)] ]"> <xsl:value-of select="."> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:template> even less tested than last time David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] One for tomorrow :-), Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] One for tomorrow :-), Chris Bayes |
[xsl] ANN: New Visual XSL design to, Sanjay Manchanda | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT implementation, Frank Chen |
Month |