Subject: RE: [xsl] RE: A simple solution (Was: Re: One for tomorrow :-) ) From: "Daniel Newman" <daniel.newman@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:21:14 +0100 |
So why isn't it working for me? How can following-sibling::*[not(substring(.,string-length(.))=',')][4] not return just the forth node, but all nodes? I'm confused :-( And I just love those font tags. I even use upper case HTML tags!!! hah hah. If I removed my font tags, I'd have to use that terribly unreliable css :-) There are users out there still using Netscape you know. Cheers David, Daniel -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of David Carlisle Sent: 04 July 2001 11:56 To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: A simple solution (Was: Re: One for tomorrow :-) ) I'm using <xsl:value-of select="following-sibling::*[not(substring(.,string-length(.))=',')][positio n()=4]" /> To hopefully retrieve 12 POINT STREET, [position()=4] (or equivalently [4]) would select the 4th node that was in the list generated by following-sibling::*[not(substring(.,string-length(.))=',')] ie the 4th sibling (just counting those not ending with a comma) (by the way are you sure you really want to polute your generated HTML with all those <font> elements, they are deprecated in HTML4 and XHTML) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: A simple solution (Wa, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: A simple solution (Wa, David Carlisle |
[xsl] XSL-FO, roger . day | Date | RE: [xsl] New to XML - probably not, Daniel Newman |
Month |