Subject: RE: [xsl] Empty nodes From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 14:33:06 +0100 |
> You make me confuse ... :) > Do you mind to give us some examples of > 1. "has no child nodes" > 2. "has zero-length string value" > 3. "has no child elements or text nodes" <a/> satisfies 1,2, and 3 <a><b/></a> satisfies 2 <a><!--comment--></a> satisfies 2 and 3. Attributes, on these definitions, make no difference. But of course you are perfectly entitled to define "empty" as meaning "has no attributes", if that's what you want to test for. PS, please tell your legal department to stop adding this junk to your mail. I haven't read it, and I hereby give notice that I regard it as having no legal effect. And the same applies to everyone else. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Empty nodes, Benoit_Aumars | Thread | Re: [xsl] Empty nodes, David Carlisle |
[xsl] Re: Empty nodes, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | [xsl] Saxon announcement, Michael Kay |
Month |