Subject: RE: [xsl] sorting by date From: "Oleg Tkachenko" <ost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 19:12:02 +0200 |
Hello Mike ! > The spec isn't completely unambiguous on the point, Do you mean the following ? "The sort must be stable: in the sorted list of nodes, any sub list that has sort keys that all compare equal must be in document order." (http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt.html#sorting) >but the general > consensus, I think, is that order=descending should give the reverse of > order=ascending, including for duplicates. > Ok, but Saxon and Xalan produce <Item id="8"> <Date>17042000</Date> </Item><Item id="3"> <Date>22121999</Date> </Item><Item id="2"> <Date>07071999</Date> </Item><Item id="9"> <Date>11011999</Date> </Item><Item id="1"> <Date>02111998</Date> </Item><Item id="4"> <Date>02111998</Date> </Item><Item id="5"> <Date>02111998</Date> </Item><Item id="6"> <Date>02111998</Date> </Item><Item id="7"> <Date>02111998</Date> </Item><Item id="10"> <Date>10071998</Date> </Item> All Item with the same sort key value are in document order. So, who is on the right road ? --- Oleg Tkachenko Multiconn International XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] sorting by date, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] sorting by date, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] sorting by date, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] weird behavior with last(), Nathan Shaw |
Month |