Subject: RE: [xsl] This can't be right, XML with no root element: Saxon & XT vs. Xalan From: "Dylan Walsh" <Dylan.Walsh@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:12:59 +0100 |
To clarify: the syntax for a "text declaration" is exactly the same as an XML declaration e.g.: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> Is that correct? > -----Original Message----- > From: David Carlisle [SMTP:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:30 AM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] This can't be right, XML with no root element: > Saxon & XT vs. Xalan > > > > out of curiousity, would the above output be a well-formed external > > general parsed entity, given that it starts with an xml declaration? > > _if_ it started with an xml declaration it wouldn't be a well formed > external > general parsed entity, but that wasn't an xml declaration (despite the > attribute name on xml-output) it was a text declaration. > > David > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet > delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further > information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively > call > Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] This can't be right, XML , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] This can't be right, XML , Rob Lugt |
[xsl] namespace declaration when ge, Seaborne, Mark | Date | RE: [xsl] namespace declaration whe, Julian Reschke |
Month |