Subject: Re: [xsl] Several rules vs a single rule with a choose operator From: "Alexander Gutman" <gutman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 18:17:15 +0700 |
Trevor Nash wrote: > My advice would be to choose the method that is going to be easiest to > change - probably the separate templates route. As to performance, it > is true for most software systems that time spent getting the overall > design right is much more valuable than time spent on the minute > details of implementation. In short, stop worrying about it. Thanks for the advice, Trevor (as well as for those I have deleted (but not forgot)). > > <xsl:template match="node-test[condition2]" priority="2"> > You only need the priority if condition1 and condition2 are not > mutually exclusive. Yes, they need not be mutually exclusive. > In which case I wonder why you are not testing > the common part in the 'choose' method? Hmm... Because there is no need. :-) The two approaches I presented are equivalent in all cases, aren't they? -- Alexander E. Gutman XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Several rules vs a single, Alexander Gutman | Thread | Re: [xsl] Several rules vs a single, Trevor Nash |
Re: [xsl] generating a repeatable u, Colin Muller | Date | Re: [xsl] Several rules vs a single, Trevor Nash |
Month |