Subject: RE: [xsl] A unique distinct problem From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 16:58:36 -0700 |
No problem. Yes, something like distinct() would come in handy in XPath 2.0. It's used, for example, in a number of the XQuery Use Cases document examples.[1] Evan Lenz XYZFind Corp. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlquery-use-cases > -----Original Message----- > From: Nate [mailto:nshafer@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 4:47 PM > To: Evan Lenz > Cc: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [xsl] A unique distinct problem > > > Thanks a lot, works like a charm. Took me a bit to understand what > exactly it was doing, but now it seems so obvious =) > > Thanks again! > > Nate > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] A unique distinct problem, Nate | Thread | [xsl] XSLT Hall of Shame entry -- D, Warren Hedley |
RE: [xsl] A unique distinct problem, Nate | Date | RE: [xsl] FOP table formatting prob, Joshua . Kuswadi |
Month |