Re: [xsl] Re: XSL Literature

["Robert Koberg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxx>]

MS has no way to propriatize XML. If you are saying that Oracle has one way
to handle XML and MS has another then you would be more accurate.

First, why do you need SQL server?  Are you going to store content as blobs
or are you going to break apart the document for searches? What kind of
documents? Are you sure the filesystem will not work (load the XML (or
references to) at server startup)? This is often the best option especially
for a pre-generated site.

Here is a free middleware solution for XML to RDB:
http://www.rpbourret.com/xmldbms/ -- this guy (Ron Bourret) also maintains a
long list of XML DB solutions)

There is also the Native XML DB option.  But your client probabaly already
owns MS SQL...





----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Galbreath" <mgalbrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:27 AM
Subject: [xsl] Re: XSL Literature


> I've been tasked to write a content management system based on XSLT with
an M$ SQLServer backend.  I know M$ has proprietarized XML (what a
surprise), so I don't think the W3C standard is going to fit exactly.
Anyone know of a manual particular to M$SQLServer and XSL?
>
> Cheers!
> Mark
>
> > From: "Ravi Vankamamidi" <ravi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: 2001/08/14 Tue PM 06:49:32 EDT
> >
> > >"Building Oracle XML Applications" by Steve Muench
> >
> > .. and a damn good book at that! One of the BEST books on programming
(apart
> > from the concise c-book by the gurus) that I ever laid my eyes on.
> >
> > -Ravi
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list