Subject: Re: Re: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML From: Mark Galbreath <mgalbrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:04:55 EDT |
I, for one, believe in "the right tool for the job," be it Microsoft, Sun, IBM, Oracle, or whatever. I hold no preconceived biases towards any technology. In fact, despite me being a solid Java developer (been coding Java since beta 2), I think .NET is pretty cool stuff and have been doing proof-of-concepts with VS.NET beta 1 and beta 2 (C#) for a month now. And while McLauglin is not the only source I've read accusing Microsoft of varying from W3C standards, I think this topic has the potential to get out of hand very quickly and should probably be dropped. Cheers! Mark > From: "Michael Beddow" <mbnospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 2001/08/15 Wed AM 10:36:01 EDT > On Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:10 PM > Well, O'Reilly believes in freedom of speech and allows authors to write > rubbish like this, provided the technical content is accurate. > McLaughlin's book is excellent on his core topics, but like some > denizens of this list, he seems to be a knee-jerk Microsoft hater. Hence > this ludicrous claim. > > Michael XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML, Max Dunn | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML, Joshua Allen |
Re: [xsl] Displaying Images using M, Jennifer Hochgesang | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: Re: xpath for getting, Jeni Tennison |
Month |