Subject: RE: [xsl] working with XSLFO: validation. From: "Max Dunn" <maxdunn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:15:40 -0700 |
I think there are definitely several scenarios in which validation of XSLFO would be desirable. Doesn't the popularity of the 'RenderX trial version' of a DTD clearly show that this is a real world need? Max -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Francis Norton Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:38 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] working with XSLFO: validation. Tobias Reif wrote: > > >> Scenario 2. <snip schema-guided XML editor> Scenario 3. I'd like to offer another scenario - using schema-guided editors to help create XSLT transforms that consume XSLFO. I've been playing with XML Spy 4 beta 2 and it has support for building mySchema -> HTML transforms, using an XML Schema and an instance doc as inputs. It's a great idea. I'd like to be able to generate mySourceSchema -> myTargetSchema transforms the same way, this is a very good start. As a tool development activity, this scenario would presumably be in scope? Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] working with XSLFO: valid, Francis Norton | Thread | [xsl] VS: XSL-List Digest V3 #1004, Samuli Niiranen |
RE: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML, Julian Reschke | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML, Robert Koberg |
Month |