Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT Tree Model From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 12:49:03 +0100 |
> 2. Is there a better/more economical/more succinct way of writing this > stylesheet? well you could mis out namespaceURI="{namespace-uri()} for those nodes that don't have a namespace uri. (/, processing-instruction, comment, text, namespace) and you could miss out localName="{local-name()}" for those nodes that don't have a name at all (/, comment, text) > 1. I wanted to find namespace nodes by catching them in a template a match pattern of node() should match namespace nodes, but probably it's easier to use for-each, as you have done. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XSLT Tree Model, WATKIN-JONES,ADAM (H | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT Tree Model, Mike Brown |
[xsl] testing for existence of an e, Irene Hall | Date | Re: [xsl] testing for existence of , Jörg Heinicke |
Month |