Subject: RE: [xsl] msxml2: What can be used instead of <xsl:variable> From: Dmitri Ilyin <dmitri.ilyin@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 17:29:21 +0200 |
> > > Most of microsoft sample pages are gone. > > mabe that is a hint that rather than try to maintain code in an > unsupported language, it would be easier to use a processor that > implements a supported language. It's odd, becouse IE5 and IE5.5 will be shiped with msxml2, so there are a lot of installations out there. I have to make my style sheet msxml2 conform, becouse they have to run in IE5 and IE5.5 (with msxml2) > It may be noted that while msxml3 > supported the msxml2 transformation language as well as XSLT, > msxml4 does not, it only supports XSLT. > > David > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet > delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further > information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or > alternatively call > Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] msxml2: What can be used , Wendell Piez | Thread | RE: [xsl] msxml2: What can be used , Dmitri Ilyin |
Re: [xsl] msxml2: What can be used , David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] What's wrong with XalanC?, Ofer Kalisky |
Month |