Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt 2.0, eval-function, call-template From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:03:43 +0100 |
You seem to have missed the fact that the XSLT 2.0 requirements document includes an address for feedback and comments (and it isn't this list...) Mike Kay > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Volker > Renneberg > Sent: 08 October 2001 14:58 > To: XSL-List@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [xsl] xslt 2.0, eval-function, call-template > > > Hi! > > After examining the web I found an old XSLT 2.0 requirement > document from > April 2001. Is there any new version? > > > Looking at that 2.0 requirement document an "eval"-function > doesn't seem to > be planned. Is this right? Especially for dynamic evaluation > I would like to > have an eval-function in my expressions. > > > Another thing to think about is the syntax of call-template. > To me it is > very tedious to call templates especially when using > parameters (suddenly > four lines are filled with almost nothing). I would like to have an > abbreviated syntax: > > <xsl:call-template name="xyz" > params="par1 => <expression>; par2 => <expression>"/> > > This is much shortert and easier to read (par1 and par2 are > bound to those > expressions). This may be possible for normal > apply-template-calls, too. > > ciao > Volker > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0, eval-function, , Francis Norton | Thread | [xsl] running saxon on commandline,, Sakaama Heesakkers |
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0, eval-function, , Francis Norton | Date | [xsl] Paging and Sorting, Katie McNally |
Month |