Subject: RE: [xsl] Comparision of parsers From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:02:05 +0100 |
Ross Kendall writes: > this is a comparison of a few XSLT processors under perl, it may not include > some of the processors that you would hope, nevertheless you will find some > of the performance info useful (even if you don't use perl) > > http://iterx.org/xslt/performance.html This is highly misleading, as it omits libxslt, which is useable through Perl, and is undoubtedly a fuller and faster implementation than the other two sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Comparision of parsers, Ross Kendall | Thread | RE: [xsl] Comparision of parsers, Chris Bayes |
RE: [xsl] Convert xml to PDF, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0, eval-function, , Francis Norton |
Month |