Subject: Re: [xsl] Problem with not() function. From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 09:14:06 +0100 |
> I meet a problem when use not function in the xsl your problem isn't with not() it is with [] self::para selects the current node if it is a para, and selects the empty set otherwise. so... self::para[1] selects the first node in th eabove, ie it is the same as self::para you want somnething like <xsl:apply-templates select="*[ not(self::para and not(preceding-sibling::para)) and not(self::title) and not(self::graphic and not(preceding-sibling::graphic))]" /> David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Problem with not() function., Ling Kok Choon | Thread | Re: [xsl] Problem with not() functi, Ling Kok Choon |
Re: [xsl] Building a partial refere, J S Publications | Date | Re: [xsl] Building a partial refere, David Carlisle |
Month |