Subject: Re: [xsl] best way to generate form from xml+schema? From: "cutlass" <cutlass@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 11:37:25 +0100 |
last but not least is one can now use cold fusion app server, there are now a few cold fusion tags that either escape to using the well known processors or some custom made solutions. chow jf ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Seaman" <graham@xxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:35 AM Subject: Re: [xsl] best way to generate form from xml+schema? > On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, cutlass wrote: > > > Hello Graham, > > > > so you are looking for a c++, c, perl server side open source solution. > > > > your best bets are > > > > a ) AxKit, which uses sablotron ( though dont know where axkit has gone to > > these days as i think it is being integrated with Apache possibly ), but > > sablotron can be used www.gingerall.com > > > > b) Saxon comes in , an Instant form at saxon.sourceforge.net > > > > c) mod_xslt is a mod extension to Apache > > > > all involve a learning curve, within xslt and outside ( especially setting > > up mod_perl for use with mod extensions ). > > > > in addition u could use the Apache Xalan c++ xslt processor. > > > > good luck, jim fuller > > > I'm actually using the gnome libxml/libxslt libraries (which have been > fine so far and quite fast; thanks Daniel!). > I'm using the Perl XML::LibXML and XML::LibXSLT modules (from Axkit) as > front ends, called from mod_perl. These seem ok so far. > I've avoided using the full Axkit, partly because I want to learn how to > do this stuff for myself, partly because I'm unsure of the current status > of Axkit given that the website is down. > > From what I've seen so far, I'd say this combination is a good addition > to your list above, and easy to get set up and running (on Unix, anyway). > Debugging output is a bit limited compared with Xalan (the only other > XML/XSL processor I've tried), and I believe libxml is slightly less > strict than Xalan (for example, I've found differences over acceptance of > multiple charsets in a single xml file: libxml accepts and processes this, > xalan doesn't). > > One thing I haven't tried yet (but will soon) is using extensions: I know > libxslt supports these, not certain about XML::LibXSLT. > > best wishes > Graham > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] best way to generate form, Graham Seaman | Thread | Re: [xsl] best way to generate form, Sebastian Rahtz |
Re: [xsl] best way to generate form, Graham Seaman | Date | Re: [xsl] best way to generate form, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |