Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: XSLT Date From: Joerg Pietschmann <joerg.pietschmann@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 19:43:52 +0200 |
Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote > I agree about the potential for disappointment, but perhaps this is best > handled as an expectation management problem? Use this as a target > spec., and make sure potential users realise that they will have to > provide or use their own localization (of course, that's "localisation" > for my fellow Brits) routines. > I don't quite understand this. What i meant was: People have a tendency to put "17. Juni 2001" into their XML and expect the XSL (XPath) processor to deal with it. People tend to avoid reading specs about stuff they think they already know. >From my experience ISO 8601 doesn't seem to be as widely known as i like, so there will probably be some moans when they discover that they have to use it. Regards J.Pietschmann XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: XSLT Date, Francis Norton | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: XSLT Date, Francis Norton |
RE: [xsl] She's done it, and it loo, Joshua Allen | Date | [xsl] for loop, Clark, Jason |
Month |