|
Subject: Re: [xsl] ***********Transformation of an XML document containing a default namespace ************ From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 24 Oct 2001 19:22:41 +0100 |
>>>>> "David" == David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
David> According to the spec, you _never_ get any control over th
David> eprefixes used, and it is perfectly OK for an XSLT
David> serialiser to always use prefixes like kmsqzzxss1:
David> kmsqzzxss2: .... even if the stylesheet uses fo: or
That rather depends upon what your definition of perfectly OK is.
---------
Sure, it's OK to do it, as the XSLT spec allows it, but perfect?
Canonical XML has a very different idea on this, and the spec for it
lays out it's reasons.
--
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] ***********Transformation, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] ***********Transformation, David Carlisle |
| Re: [xsl] variables numbers and app, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] Confusion ??, Sunil Dua |
| Month |