Subject: Re: [xsl] Well-balanced fragments as input to XSLT 2.0? From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 15:31:57 +0000 |
I think you're right. I hadn't spotted that - I just noticed that I couldn't do it in MSXML3 DOM + XSLT. Do you think this would count as a non-compliance? David Carlisle wrote: > > > I would like to propose that XSLT 2.0 should be able to accept the same > > kind of "well-balanced" fragments as it can output. > > This is already allowed in XSLT 1.0 > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#root-node-children > > David > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet > delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further > information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call > Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Well-balanced fragments a, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Well-balanced fragments a, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] re: Change an XSLT top-le, Chris Bayes | Date | Re: [xsl] DOM level 3 XPath Specifi, Francis Norton |
Month |