Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. client-side From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:08:43 GMT |
> ever had to manage the support costs associated with upgrading 2000 > copies of IE 5 to use MSXML 3?) How come those 2000 machines were running IE5 and not netscape 1? If the machines in an organisation all have IE5 then it means that they, or their operating system, or their browser, get upgraded reasonably often anyway, so before long they'll have an XSLT aware browser whether they like it or not, and as Chris said for some situations upgrading IE5 can be automatic (in some situations security considerations or network non-access prevent that) so basically I think it is reasonable to assume that the majority of clients will be xslt enabled "soon" where you just have to define "soon" appropriately. If you've been waiting 2000 years to get mathematics rendering in your web browser then arguing whether this will happen in days or months or years is really just small change, the good news is that it will happen. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, Chris Bayes | Thread | RE: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, Hunsberger, Peter |
RE: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, Chris Bayes | Date | RE: [xsl] Collecting attributes fro, WATKIN-JONES,ADAM (H |
Month |