Subject: RE: [xsl] question about implements-prefix From: Don Bruey <dbruey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:11:33 -0500 |
Sorry for my answer, Todd, see Chris' explanation. Red-faced Don -----Original Message----- From: Todd Binder [mailto:todd_binder@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:59 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] question about implements-prefix Don, now i am confused, i get the namespace concept, if i were to change it from user:current_date to other:current_date, it wouldn't work because the function current_date is defined within the user namespace. my question was purely with the URI, and what it's significance was... in my case i set it to todd@xxxxxxxx which is not a valid email address, but that didn't seem to be a problem. i was merely wondering if it needed to be a valid URI or not.... - todd Todd Binder todd_binder@xxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Bruey" <dbruey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:09 PM Subject: RE: [xsl] question about implements-prefix > In the case of the original question, the namespace URI mattered. Not > putting in the correct URI for the "user" namespace meant that the extension > function in question would not be recognized. > > In my example, I mentioned XSL's namespace as an example of something that > if you change it, your stylesheet won't work as you might expect, which is > an easy example to try to see what happens when you just put in any old URI. > When I teach XML, I use that very example to show how namespaces work and > what URIs mean to processors, and it's a pretty effective example. > > Don > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:43 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] question about implements-prefix > > > > > It absolutely matters what you put there. > > Not really, in that if you put _any_ string there except the namespace > names of xslt and msxsl the stylesheet will act in exactly the same way. > > David > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet > delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further > information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call > Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] question about implements, Don Bruey | Thread | Re: [xsl] question about implements, Todd Binder |
RE: [xsl] question about implements, Don Bruey | Date | [xsl] cross browser dhtml tree xslt, John-Mason P. Shacke |
Month |