Subject: RE: [xsl] translets vs. templates From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:10:44 -0000 |
The biggest benefit from XSLTC comes, I think, from the size of the translets, making them easy to download and execute client-side. Execution speed is faster than most interpreters, but not dramatically so. This is because most of the work (building the tree, sorting, serializing) is exactly the same whether the stylesheet is compiled or not. Mike Kay > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of > James Parsons > Sent: 14 December 2001 14:48 > To: XSL-List@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [xsl] translets vs. templates > > > I am trying to get a handle on XSLTC and its benefits. In terms of > performance in a server environment, is there an advantage to > transforming > with translets, rather than cached Templates? My hunch is > that they are > probably a dead heat with the only advantage (and possibly occasional > disadvantage) of translets being persistence across server restarts... > > -Jim Parsons > -Ars Digita Corporation > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] translets vs. templates, James Parsons | Thread | [xsl] GUI transformation tools, David Hooker |
Re: [xsl] conditional namespaces, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] for-each order, Jeni Tennison |
Month |