Re: [xsl] Re: xpath2 functions returning ()

Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: xpath2 functions returning ()
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:12:56 GMT
> It is correct to define the empty string and the empty sequence to be
> the same strings (the empty sequence naturally belongs to all sequence
> types).

That wuld be a rather big change. If strings were sequences in that
sense then ("abc")[2] would be "b".

Currently in the Xpath2 draft strings, like any values of a primitive type are
considered to be equivalent to sequences of length 1, with the value of
the item in the sequence being the string. (Ie Xpath2 has taken
sequences on board totally, singleton values are not really first class
objects any more, they are just sequences of length 1)

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread