Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates de-mystified From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 13:49:54 GMT |
> Is it because you find your comments answered differently according to > which list you send them to? well actualy experience seems to indicate that they aren't answered at all (especially xquery ones) unless the message is cross posted to a different list. This is why I've been cross posting all my responses to either xsl-list or xml-dev in addition to one of the official comment lists. > If so are you suggesting creating one big > XMLQuery/XPath/XSLT mailing list for general discussion, comments? Not necessarily for discussion but I feel the official comment lists as advertised in the status section should be the same for each document. Suppose I want to make an official response to the drafts along the lines of widget functionality appears to be shared between xquery and xslt and I think the widget function should be moved into core xpath or the functions and operators document. Do I send that to www-xpath-comments@xxxxxx, xslt-editors@xxxxxx or www-xml-query-comments@xxxxxx, or cross post to all three? David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates , Max Froumentin | Thread | [xsl] Queestion about postional pre, Carlos Sanchez |
Re: [xsl] XSLT/XPath 2.0: a USEFUL , Jeni Tennison | Date | RE: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re, Kevin Jones |
Month |