Subject: RE: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . in for) From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 16:37:39 -0000 |
> <xsl:variable name="emps" > select="//employee[some $d in $departments satisfies > lower-case(./@dept) = > > which reminds me, why is that $d and not d ? > No good reason, it just came that way from XQuery, and it happens to make it easier to parse without reserved words. I've been wondering whether we should allow the "$" in name="$emps" to remove the inconsistency. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] xpath test suite?, Carmelo Montanez | Date | Re: [xsl] the problem with include , Matt G. |
Month |