Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0

Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:23:54 GMT
> I might be reading it wrong, but I think that the << operator is
> supposed to cover the combination of ancestor and preceding axes. So
> if you did:

more than that I think: document order orders nodes across documents
(in an implementation way) whereas nodes in different documents are  not
comparable with orderings based on an axes.

(
David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread