Subject: [xsl] Re: mapping (Was: Re: Re: . in for) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 00:15:17 -0800 (PST) |
Jeni Tennison <jeni at jenitennison dot com> wrote: [snip] > Or if you just don't like the -> then there are still a few ASCII > characters left, and several interesting combinations of them, or > there's always a word (or two) as the operator, like 'map': > > $departments map lower-case(.) > > and: > > $coordinates map (. * 2) > map if (position() mod 2) then . + 50 else . > Hi Jeni, As I already pointed out in my reply to Dave, > $departments map lower-case(.) would be ambiguous, as lower-case(.) is a value/string (the result of the application of lower-case() on . What map needs is a function (or at least an expression). Therefore, a more correct and unambiguous way to present the above is: $departments map expression('lower-case(.)') Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] RE: mapping (Was: Re: Re: . i, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: mapping (Was: Re: Re:, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] counting question, Jo Bourne | Date | RE: [xsl] xsl:include from differen, Michael Kay |
Month |