Subject: Re: Regular expression functions (Was: Re: [xsl] comments on December F&O draft) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:37:23 GMT |
Mike >This is because although schema >specifies that the regexp must match the whole string, xf:match() in effect >tests the regexp against every substring of the supplied string and returns >a list of those substrings that match. oh so this suggests a different answer to my "overlapping matches" question (in the message on the F&O document that I cross posted here and to the query-commets list) than the one Jeni said I ought to expect.... if the regexp is aa and the string is aaa, then your description would suggest that aa gets matched against the substrings of aaa: a aa aaa a aa a and matches the 2nd and 5th of these, so returning (1,2). David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Regular expression functions (W, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Regular expression functions (W, Jeni Tennison |
[xsl] Re: distinct moves problem, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl architecture issue, David Carlisle |
Month |