Subject: RE: [xsl] Content constructors and sequences From: "Kevin Jones" <kjouk@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:03:41 -0000 |
I like the ideas in this, but (isn't there always one?) as I think other people have said the tree or sequence representation is difficult. Anyway, I am probably missing something important but can't you just create a tree using the new semantics of copy-of on a sequence of simple values. The only disadvantage I can see is if you want to really have to a sequence of simple values you will need to convert it back from a tree but that doesn't sound like it would be difficult. Particularly if processors are smart enough to retain the data in its native format as it has been suggest they might. I would like to see sequences in XSLT, but I don't think putting them in along side trees is the natural approach. More as an integral part of the tree structure. Kev. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Content constructors and , Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] Content constructors and , Jeni Tennison |
RE: Regular expression functions (W, Marc Portier | Date | RE: Regular expression functions (W, Marc Portier |
Month |