Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: A question about the expressive power and limitations of XPath 2.0 From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 18:56:55 +0000 |
David, >> We would have to address here the problem that Marc pointed out to do >> with how repeated subexpressions are captured... > > probably you'd just have to do whatever perl does with the meaning of > numbered subterms that are repeated. Apparently that's "capture the last one". So if you had: match('bar', '(.){3}') then the first subexpression would have the value 'r'. I can see why that's the case - otherwise you wouldn't be able to predictably access matched subexpressions after that one by number. Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: A question about the , David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] Re: A question about the expr, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] Trouble writing .xsl, Jeni Tennison | Date | RE: [xsl] Trouble writing .xsl, Sullivan, Dan |
Month |