<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

RE: [xsl] xslt/xpath 2.0 comments ( long )

Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt/xpath 2.0 comments ( long )
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:04:16 -0000
> I might be misunderstanding you, but it seems to me that given that
> the user is writing a wrapper function, they should be putting that
> wrapper function in their own namespace rather than the one for
> Saxon extensions.  So this is consistent with or supports the idea
> of the processor giving an error when one of its extension functions
> are redefined.

Of course they should use their own namespace. But when writing the spec, we
have to say what happens if they don't.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
RE: [xsl] xslt/xpath 2.0 comments (, naha Thread [xsl] xslt extensions - whats it ab, peter gibbons
RE: [xsl] alternating bg colour in , Michael Kay Date RE: [xsl] XSLT match with regex wha, Michael Kay
Month