<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

RE: [xsl] Re: RE: Higher-Order Functions in XPath 2.0

Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: RE: Higher-Order Functions in XPath 2.0
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:41:20 -0000
> To be strict, it seems that $a[$i], where $a contains a
> sequence (not a
> node-set) is not valid syntax according to the current WD. Or am I
> wrong?
>
The semantic rules in the XPath 2.0 WD do currently say that $a in $a[$i]
must consist entirely of nodes, but that restriction was not intended -
regard it as an error in the document. The restriction was intended to apply
only to the operands of the "/" operator, but found its way to the wrong
place in the spec.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
[xsl] Re: RE: Higher-Order Function, Dimitre Novatchev Thread Re: [xsl] Re: RE: Higher-Order Func, Terje Norderhaug
RE: [xsl] Alternative to variable i, Michael Kay Date [xsl] Fw: develop content managemen, Robert Koberg
Month