Subject: Re: [xsl] Converting logical <em>s to physical <i>s (nesting prob lem) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 01:34:58 GMT |
What if you use: <xsl:otherwise> </em><xsl:apply-templates/><em> </xsl;otherwise> I'm not sure if you need to put the '</em>' in <xsl:text> elements ?!? xsl:text isn't needed for tha. with or without xsl:text that isn't wat you want to do it just generates the characters < / e m which will appear in the output just as you show then here with the < quoted. There is a lot of difference between making an element node and making a text node that has some text that has xml syntax. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Converting logical <em>s , Joshua . Kuswadi | Thread | [xsl] XSLT element containment algo, Theory Guy |
RE: [xsl] Converting logical <em>s , Joshua . Kuswadi | Date | [xsl] XSLT element containment algo, Theory Guy |
Month |