Subject: Re: [xsl] Saxon6.0.2: user written extensions From: "cutlass" <cutlass@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:45:18 -0000 |
uhhh, many apoligies, i meant to also suggest using the most up to date saxon with respect to writing extensions, i have found the newer releases to be much better. cheers, jim fuller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Trevor Nash" <tcn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:19 PM Subject: Re: [xsl] Saxon6.0.2: user written extensions > On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:02:38 -0000, cutlass wrote: > > >http://saxon.sourceforge.net/saxon7.0/extensibility.html > > > >explains the method with SAXON > > You will be much safer using the documentation which came with the > release you are using. There is quite a lot of difference between > 6.0.2 and 7.0. > > Trevor Nash > -- > Traditional training & distance learning, > Consultancy by email > > Melvaig Software Engineering Limited > voice: +44 (0) 1445 771 271 > email: tcn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Saxon6.0.2: user written , Trevor Nash | Thread | RE: [xsl] Saxon6.0.2: user written , Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Saxon6.0.2: user written , Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] general problem followup, Andrew Welch |
Month |