Subject: RE: [xsl] generate xsl 1.0 from 2.0 question From: "Bryan Rasmussen" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:05:50 +0100 |
now the coffee's kicking in, I should be able to get rid of all my named templates, click_here etc. and just have <xsl:template name="translator2"> <xsl:param name="transparam"/> <temp:choose><xsl:for-each select="$translator[@name=$transparam]/child::node()[name()!='']"> <xsl:call-template name="translator"/></xsl:for-each></temp:choose> </xsl:template> right? in xslt 2.0 I mean. Is there any optimization that can be done on that? >anyway the thing I was wondering about is in the template name="click_here" >you'll notice I do the $translator[@name='Click_here'] is there anyway to >select the name of the template one is in(in xslt 2.0), in such a way that I >could make a parameter holding the template/@name value and pass it to a >named template through a call? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] generate xsl 1.0 from 2.0, Bryan Rasmussen | Thread | RE: [xsl] generate xsl 1.0 from 2.0, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Muenchian method, and key, DPawson | Date | RE: [xsl] generate xsl 1.0 from 2.0, Bryan Rasmussen |
Month |