RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why XSLT is better than JSP+Velocit y

["Kovach, Dave" <dave.kovach@xxxxxxx>]

To keep this focused on XSLT...

You CAN handle business logic in an ASP or JSP or plain
SERVLET environment and still use XSLT and XML for building
a kick-butt presentation engine framework... it all works
really well together - cause xml and xslt (because its
xml) are so invisible and transparent to use and put into
play...

David Kovach
SAP Labs
Palo Alto, CA

-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Kearney [mailto:bk@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:56 PM
To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why XSLT is better than
JSP+Velocit y


Here is another...

How cheaply you can get folks who know it. This is a valid business reason
to stick with JSPs. They teach it all over.

-- bk


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:40 PM
> To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why XSLT is better than
> JSP+Velocit y
> 
> 
> > Here are some reasons to stick with JSPs:
> > 1. The data needs to have "business logic" processing done 
> as it's used
> > to generate a web page -- things like calling Java classes (or COM
> > components, etc.)
> 
> I would argue that if you really have this requirement and 
> you really can't
> figure out how to push it out of the presentation layer (with 
> XML/XSLt it's
> usually pretty easy) then you may have a need for XSLt 
> extensions.  I do not
> think that it is a reason to stick with JSP's.
> 
> Peter Hunsberger
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list