RE: [xsl] An issue with XPath 2.0 sequences (Was Re: RE: Muenchian method, and keys 'n stuff)

Subject: RE: [xsl] An issue with XPath 2.0 sequences (Was Re: RE: Muenchian method, and keys 'n stuff)
From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:25:34 -0800
Mike Kay wrote:
> Non-nested sequences are
> sufficient to serve those two purposes; and nested sequences would serve
> merely to increase the overlap and inconsistency between the
> "trees" part of
> the model (which is about handling XML documents) and the "variables" part
> of the model (which is about doing computations).

I agree. Hopefully it will serve as a good compromise between the two
models.

Evan


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread