Subject: Re: [xsl] Article: The Functional Programming Language XSLT From: Graham Seaman <graham@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:38:13 +0000 (GMT) |
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Dimitre Novatchev wrote: > I know that nothing can make the members of the XPath 2.0 agree that > there is any use-case for higher-order functions, but... > > http://www.topxml.com/xsl/articles/fp > I have trouble reading this kind of thing on a screen, and prefer to print it to read at leisure. The printer-friendly version on topxml isn't very printer-friendly, at least with my set-up (and crashes NN4 on Linux :-( - mind you, lots of things do that); is there a pdf version available anywhere? Thanks Graham XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] SGML to HTML conversion., Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: [xsl] basic question about xpat, Bryan Rasmussen |
RE: [xsl] Re: Re: An issue with XPa, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] basic question about xpat, Bryan Rasmussen |
Month |