Subject: RE: [xsl] basic question about xpath support of xml schema From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:07:44 -0000 |
> by leave the way open for implementors do you mean specifying > what any basic > non xml schema validation > mechanism inside xslt should support, and functions etc. to > access such? or > do you mean that an implementor could have an extension function that > allowed you to use Relax NG? > I mean we could try and define the extensibility mechanisms and the conformance rules such that an implementor who wanted to support something like RELAX could extend the language to do so. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] basic question about xpat, Bryan Rasmussen | Thread | Re: [xsl] basic question about xpat, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Enumerating template matc, Morten | Date | RE: [xsl] Re: RE: Re: Re: An issue , Michael Kay |
Month |